Legal Opinion
Rolle Mfg. Co. v. Marco Chemicals, Inc.
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided March 24, 1950No. C. 18-50PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SMITH, District Judge.
This is a civil action in which the plaintiff asserts a claim for an amount allegedly due from the defendant under a contract. The action is before the Court at this time on a motion for summary judgment filed by the defendant under Rule 56(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. The motion is predicated primarily upon affidavits and the exhibits annexed thereto; the defendant filed no answer to the complaint. The opposition to the motion is predicated upon the complaint and the exhibits annexed thereto, and affidavits.
It is our opinion that the present…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Doehler Metal Furniture Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1945
- Frederick Hart & Co. v. Recordgraph CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1948
- Arenas v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Corn Exchange National Bank & Trust Co., Philadelphia v. TaubelSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1934
- Rogers v. Girard Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1947
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Shafer v. Reo Motors, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1953
- Dovberg v. Dow Chemical Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1961
- State v. Ashton CompanyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1967
- Miller v. United Security Insurance CompanyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1973
- Oil Trading Associates, Inc. v. Texas City Refining, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1962
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.