Legal Opinion

Barrett v. West Chester University of Pennsylvania

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided April 24, 2009No. Civil Action 03-4978Published

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

SURRICK, District Judge.

Presently before the Court is Plaintiffs’ Motion for a Reconsideration and Amendment of Award of Attorney’s Fees. (Doc. No. 45.) For the following reasons, Plaintiffs’ Motion will be denied.

I. BACKGROUND

A. Underlying Litigation 1

On April 28, 2003, West Chester University (“WCU”) announced its decision to eliminate its women’s gymnastics and men’s lacrosse programs. At the same time, WCU stated that it intended to add women’s golf to its athletic program.

A concerned parent of one of the eight members of the women’s gymnastics team contacted Trial Lawyers for…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Pennsylvania v. Delaware Valley Citizens' Council for Clean AirSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Harsco Corp. v. Lucjan ZlotnickiCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1986
  4. Hughes v. RepkoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1978
  5. Glendon Energy Co. v. Borough of GlendonDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1993

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API