Legal Opinion
In Re Welfare of C.T.L.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided October 10, 2006No. A06-874PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PETERSON, Judge.
A delinquency petition was filed alleging that respondent aided and abetted first-degree aggravated robbery and committed fifth-degree assault. Appellant moved for an order requiring respondent to provide a biological specimen for the purpose of DNA analysis pursuant to Minn.Stat. § 299C.105 (Supp.2005). Respondent challenged the constitutionality of Minn.Stat. § 299C.105 and moved for an order certifying the issue of the statute’s constitutionality to this court as an important and doubtful question. The district court held that the statute’s “compulsory DNA profiling…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Skinner v. Railway Labor Executives' Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
- King v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2012
- In re the Welfare of M.L.M.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
- Mario W. v. Hon. kaipio/stateArizona Supreme Court · 2012
- State v. MedinaSupreme Court of Vermont · 2014
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.