Legal Opinion

Rucker v. Rucker

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided January 8, 1946No. [No. 53, October Term, 1945.]PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMarbury, C. J.

The issue in this case is the authority of an equity court to pass, on its own motion, an order requiring the complainant in a divorce action to show cause why an enrolled decree should not be striken out for fraud in its obtention. The question is prematurely presented by an appeal from an order refusing complainant’s motion to strike out the show cause order, and requiring complainant to answer. This is an interlocutory matter from which no immediate appeal lies here. Although this appeal will have to be dismissed, the question presented, we think, should be discussed.

The grounds upon which…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hazel-Atlas Glass Co. v. Hartford-Empire Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. Saltzgaver v. SaltzgaverCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1944
  3. Croyle v. CroyleCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1944
  4. Fisher v. FisherCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1902
  5. Bailey v. BaileyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1943

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Lickle v. BooneCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1947
  2. Wooddy v. WooddyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1970
  3. O'Donnell v. O'DonnellCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API