G. W. Hirth, Inc. v. Clybourn Realty Co.

This case presents two questions: (1) Was the thirty-day notice served by plaintiff and required by the provisions of sub. (1), sec. 289.02, Stats., fatally defective because it was neither addressed to nor served upon the defendant Clybourn Realty Company? (2) Was the claim for lien, subsequently filed, fatally defective because it recited that the M. S. Realty Company was the owner of the premises, when in fact the defendant Clybourn Realty Company was the owner? Both questions must be answered in the negative.(1) Sub. (1), sec. 289.02, Stats., does not require the notice to be addressed to…