Legal Opinion

Jung Ja Malandris v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided March 31, 1983No. 77-1957, 78-1855Published

1Opinion of the Court

703 F.2d 1152

Jung Ja MALANDRIS, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

MERRILL LYNCH, PIERCE, FENNER & SMITH INCORPORATED,

Defendant-Appellant.

Nos. 77-1957, 78-1855.

United States Court of Appeals,

Tenth Circuit.

Argued May 16, 1979.

Decided March 4, 1981.

Order on Rehearing In Banc

March 31, 1983.

William P. Rogers, New York City (Guy C. Quinlan, James N. Benedict, John A. Karaczynski of Rogers & Wells, New York City, and Donald K. Bain and John M. Kobayashi of Holme, Roberts & Owen, Denver, Colo., were also on brief), for defendant-appellant.

William R. Fishman, Denver, Colo. (David H. Drennen of Fishman, Gengler &…

Also in this document: Dissent · Logan; Concurring in part, dissenting in part; Dissent · Seth.

2Cases cited103 opinions

  1. Singleton v. WulffSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Curtis Publishing Co. v. ButtsSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Palmer v. HoffmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  4. Tennant v. Peoria & Pekin Union Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  5. Tiller v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1943

98 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API