Legal Opinion

Sioux City Stockyards Co. v. Fribourg

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided October 12, 1903PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from Woodbury District Court. — Hon. George W. Warefield, Judge. Appeal from an order as to the distribution of the assets of tho Union Stock Yards State Bank in tlie hands of a receiver.

1Opinion of the CourtMcOiaiN, J.

In 1893, in a proper proceeding, a receiver was. appointed for tbe Union Stock Yards .State Bank, who proceeded under tbe orders of tbe court to collect the assets of the bank for the purpose of distributing them among its creditors. One H. P. Ohesly, receiver of a corporation known as the Union Stock Yards Company, filed a claim wif'h the receiver of the bank in the sum of $3,248.42, which claim wa- subsequently assigned to the-Sioux Oit.v Stock Yards Company, which is tbe intervener in the proceeding now before us. On the application of intervener, the court, on the 18th of July, .1898,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bradley v. ChesebroughSupreme Court of Iowa · 1900
  2. Jones v. ChesebroughSupreme Court of Iowa · 1898
  3. State ex rel. Stone v. Union Stock Yards State BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1897

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hodgell v. WildeWyoming Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Board of Levee Com'rs v. ParkerMississippi Supreme Court · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API