Legal Opinion

State v. Hartwig

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided October 2, 1984No. C6-84-240Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HUSPENI, Judge.

Appellant Ross Hartwig was found guilty after trial to the court of violating Minn.Stat. § 609.746 (1982), violation of pri*334vacy. On appeal, he challenges the sufficiency of evidence presented at trial. We affirm.

FACTS

Hartwig was employed by Steamatic, a company hired by complainant Michelle Meintsma’s family to clean up a fuel oil spill in their basement. Hartwig had occasionally been assigned to this job. Oil-soaked building materials were removed from the basement and placed in piles in back of the house.

On October 6, 1983, at about 3:00 p.m., complainant Meintsma was…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. SchweppeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
  2. State v. ThurmerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
  3. State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API