State v. Hartwig
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HUSPENI, Judge.
Appellant Ross Hartwig was found guilty after trial to the court of violating Minn.Stat. § 609.746 (1982), violation of pri*334vacy. On appeal, he challenges the sufficiency of evidence presented at trial. We affirm.
FACTS
Hartwig was employed by Steamatic, a company hired by complainant Michelle Meintsma’s family to clean up a fuel oil spill in their basement. Hartwig had occasionally been assigned to this job. Oil-soaked building materials were removed from the basement and placed in piles in back of the house.
On October 6, 1983, at about 3:00 p.m., complainant Meintsma was…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- State v. SchweppeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
- State v. ThurmerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1971