Legal Opinion

Cricut v. Enough For Everyone

District Court, D. Utah

Decided July 16, 2025No. 2:21-cv-00601Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH CRICUT, INC., a Delaware corporation, MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ Plaintiff, MOTION TO ADMIT DEFENDANTS’ v. EXHIBIT 581, HUGET’S LETTER ENOUGH FOR EVERYONE, INC., a Nevada corporation and DESIREE Case No. 2:21-cv-00601-TS-DAO TANNER, an individual, Judge Ted Stewart Defendants. Magistrate Judge Daphne A. Oberg This matter comes before the Court on Defendants’ Motion to admit Defendants’ Exhibit No. 581, a letter written by J. Michael Huget (“the Huget letter), made orally during trial. For the reasons…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Richard Paul DENISON, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. SWACO GEOLOGRAPH COMPANY, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
  2. Law Co., Inc. v. MOHAWK CONST. AND SUPPLY CO.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
  3. United States v. Francisco Hernandez-HerreraCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
  4. Chavez v. Thomas & Betts Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
  5. Federal Trade Commission v. HughesDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1989

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API