Legal Opinion

State v. Nay

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided January 6, 2017No. 20141185-CAPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Memorandum Decision

CHRISTIANSEN, Judge:

¶1 Defendants Michael L. Nay and Tracy L. Hanson appeal their convictions, arguing that the trial court abused its discretion when it granted the State’s motion for a joint trial of the charges against them. Nay and Hanson were tried jointly, and the jury convicted them each of possession of a controlled substance, a third degree felony; production of a controlled substance, a third degree felony; and possession of drug paraphernalia, a class B misdemeanor. The jury also convicted Hanson of possession of a firearm by a restricted person, a third degree…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Richardson v. MarshSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Delaware v. FenstererSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. State v. PullmanCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2013

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. BruunCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API