State v. Nay
Court of Appeals of Utah
1Opinion of the Court
Memorandum Decision
CHRISTIANSEN, Judge:
¶1 Defendants Michael L. Nay and Tracy L. Hanson appeal their convictions, arguing that the trial court abused its discretion when it granted the State’s motion for a joint trial of the charges against them. Nay and Hanson were tried jointly, and the jury convicted them each of possession of a controlled substance, a third degree felony; production of a controlled substance, a third degree felony; and possession of drug paraphernalia, a class B misdemeanor. The jury also convicted Hanson of possession of a firearm by a restricted person, a third degree…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Richardson v. MarshSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Delaware v. FenstererSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- State v. PullmanCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2013
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- State v. BruunCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2017