N.Y. Cable Co. v. . Mayor, Etc., of N.Y.
New York Court of Appeals
Appeal from order of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, made December 1, 1884, denying a motion on the part of the petitioner, the Hew York Cable Railway Company, to confirm the report of commissioners appointed by the Supreme Court to determine whether the railways described in the petition of said company ought to be constructed 'and operated. The report of the commissioners was in favor of the petitioner.
Read the full summary
Appeal from order of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, made December 1, 1884, denying a motion on the part of the petitioner, the Hew York Cable Railway Company, to confirm the report of commissioners appointed by the Supreme Court to determine whether the railways described in the petition of said company ought to be constructed 'and operated. The report of the commissioners was in favor of the petitioner. The refusal to confirm their report was upon the ground that the petitioner had no legal right to construct or operate a railway. The facts, so far as…
1Opinion of the Court
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.]
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] On the hearing of this motion at the General Term, the learned…
2Cited by33 opinions
- Tulare Irrigation District v. ShepardSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
- Hudson River Telephone Co. v. Watervliet Turnpike & Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1892
- Kiamesha Development Corp. v. Guild Properties, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1958
- City of Rochester v. . Rochester Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1905
- Lieberman v. Chicago & South Side Rapid Transit RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1892
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.