Legal Opinion · Concurrence

State v. Hunter

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided July 6, 2011No. 4D09-2533Published

1ConcurrenceWarner, J.

I agree that this case should be affirmed, but I write separately to question whether the statutory factor of need of specialized treatment requires the defendant to prove that the treatment he needs is not available in the prison system. Because the statute does not make this a requirement, I would conclude that it is not part of the defendant’s burden to prove this element in order for the trial court to determine that it can depart from the lowest permissible sentence under the Criminal Punishment Code.

Section 921.0026 provides mitigating circumstances “under which a departure from the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Perkins v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1991
  2. Troutman v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1993
  3. State v. TyrrellDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002
  4. State v. MannDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004
  5. State v. SpiochDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API