Legal Opinion

State v. Spioch

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided January 9, 1998No. 96-1603, 96-1911PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

706 So.2d 32 (1998)

STATE of Florida, Appellant/Cross-Appellee,

v.

Mary Ann SPIOCH, Appellee/Cross-Appellant.

Nos. 96-1603, 96-1911.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

January 9, 1998.

Rehearing Denied February 23, 1998.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Kristen L. Davenport, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellant/Cross-Appellee.

Daniel S. Ciener, Andy M. Fouche', Curtis N. Flajole and David J. Romett of Law Firm of Daniel S. Ciener, Merritt Island, for Appellee/Cross-Appellant.

GRIFFIN, Chief Judge.

Mary Ann Spioch was convicted of criminal…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part · Cobb; Concurring in part, dissenting in part · Harris.

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. State v. LawSupreme Court of Florida · 1989
  2. Jaramillo v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1982
  3. Herrera v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988
  4. Velunza v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987
  5. State v. ChandlerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Bradley v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2001
  2. Staffney v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002
  3. State v. ChubbuckDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012
  4. State v. WhiteDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000
  5. State v. FaloccoDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API