Legal Opinion

Branagh v. Chicago Bonding & Surety Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 5, 1919No. Civ. No. 2549PublishedCited by 2 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.

Action against Chicago Bonding and Surety Company as surety upon a bond alleged to have been given “in accordance with the requirements of an act of the legislature of the state of California,” by the Hudson-Johnson Construction Company, to which, as contractor, certain public highway work was awarded. Judgment went for plaintiff and against the Surety Company, which appeals therefrom on the judgment-roll.

To the complaint said defendant interposed a general demurrer, which was overruled. In addition to this alleged erroneous ruling appellant claims that the action upon the bond was not…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Williams v. BerginCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Diggins v. HartshorneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Mox, Inc. v. LeventhalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
  2. Tilden Lumber Co. v. PerinoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API