Legal Opinion

New York City Employees' Retirement System v. Brunswick Corp.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided April 21, 1992No. 92 Civ. 1714 (RPP)PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

ROBERT P. PATTERSON, Jr., District Judge.

Plaintiff, The New York City Employees’ Retirement System (“NYCERS”) moves by order to show cause, and by complaint filed March 10, 1992, for an order granting a preliminary injunction pursuant to Rule 65 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure enjoining Defendant Brunswick Corporation (“Brunswick”) from soliciting shareholder proxies for Defendant’s annual stockholders’ meeting without informing Defendant’s shareholders of NYCERS’s shareholder proposal (“the Proposal”) submitted to Defendant by letter dated November 21, 1991 from…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Wali v. CoughlinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
  2. C.L. Grimes v. Centerior Energy CorporationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1990
  3. Brooks v. Standard Oil CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1969

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. New York City Employees' Retirement System v. Securities & Exchange CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
  2. Apache Corp. v. CheveddenDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2010
  3. Apache Corp. v. New York City Employees' Retirement SystemDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2008
  4. New York City Employees' Retirement System v. Dole Food Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1992
  5. New York City Employees' Retirement System v. Securities And Exchange CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API