Legal Opinion

Moffitt v. United States Shipping Board Emergency Fleet Corp.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 23, 1922No. Appeal, No. 184PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Linn, J.,

Plaintiff sued for a balance of wages claimed pursuant to a regulation of defendant prescribing for its employees what it called “leave of absence with pay.” He was employed on September 28, 1918, to work at Philadelphia. At that date the regulation provided that “employees may be granted leave of absence with pay at the rate of 2% days for each calendar month of service.” On January 22, 1919, the first change in the regulation during plaintiff’s employment was made, limiting such leave to “30 days for each service year,” and providing that “unconsumed leave with pay that…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Sullivan v. United States Shipping Board Emergency Fleet Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
  2. Potter v. HartnettSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1892
  3. Mintz v. ScowdenSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1917

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Eason v. U.S. Emer. Fleet Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  2. Eason v. United States Shipping Board Emergency Fleet Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API