Legal Opinion
Inger WINSOR, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. HINCKLEY DODGE, INC., a Corporation, Defendant-Appellee
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided March 26, 1996No. 95-4026PublishedCited by 74 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LUCERO, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiff Inger Winsor appeals the district court’s judgment on her sexual harassment claim, brought pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e through 2000e-17. * Although we conclude that plaintiff was subjected to sexual harassment which created a hostile work environment, we affirm the judgment because the district court did not clearly err in finding that plaintiff was not constructively discharged.
I
The uncontradicted evidence shows that plaintiff began working for Hinckley Dodge as a salesperson in March 1988. At that time, she was…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Meritor Savings Bank, FSB v. VinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Barbara L. Steiner v. Showboat Operating Company, D/B/A Showboat Hotel & CasinoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by74 opinions
- Adler v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
- Madeline E. Brown v. William J. Henderson, Postmaster General of the United States Postal ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
- Alamo Heights Independent School District v. Catherine ClarkTexas Supreme Court · 2018
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. PVNF, L.L.C.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
- Kimberly Passananti v. Cook CountyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012
69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.