Legal Opinion

Stuph v. Bruner

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1882No. 9338PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Erom the Superior Court of Marion County.

1Opinion of the Court

Black, C.

The appellant sued the appellees, John Bruner and Caroline Bruner, his wife, to subject to sale certain real estate in Marion county, the legal title to which was in said Caroline, to satisfy a judgment rendered against her said husband in favor of one Minerva Carter, and assigned by her to the appellant.

Issues were formed,and the cause was submitted for trial to the court. The court stated in writing the facts and the conclusions of law upon them, and judgment was entered accordingly, which, on appeal to the general term, was affirmed.

The question to be decided here is whether the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Shand v. . HanleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
  2. Keeler v. UllrichMichigan Supreme Court · 1875
  3. Kane v. RobertsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1874
  4. Winn v. BarnettMississippi Supreme Court · 1856
  5. Converse v. HartleySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1863

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Hutchinson v. First National Bank of Michigan CityIndiana Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Gilliland v. JonesIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Petree v. BrothertonIndiana Supreme Court · 1892
  4. Plunkett v. PlunkettIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
  5. Barrow v. BarrowIndiana Supreme Court · 1886

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API