Legal Opinion

Bailey v. Bass

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided November 9, 1989No. 87-1310Published

1Opinion of the Court

KENNEDY, Justice.

The plaintiff, John W. Bailey, appeals from summary judgments entered in favor *590of defendants Ray D. Bass, B.A. Riddle, Joe Black, and Tom Cain.1 We affirm.

The dispositive issue in the case before us is whether defendant Tom Cain is entitled to discretionary function immunity from tort liability.

On April 24, 1985, Bailey was injured when two 34-foot spans of the Chickasa-bogue Creek Bridge collapsed while he was driving his vehicle across it. The collapse was due to corrosion of the bridge’s underwater steel substructure. In April 1987, Bailey sued, as individuals and in their…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Barnes v. DaleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1988
  2. Grant v. DavisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1988
  3. Perry v. Mobile CountySupreme Court of Alabama · 1986
  4. Woods v. WilsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API