Legal Opinion

Kyle v. Board of Commissioners

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided March 11, 1884No. 10,856PublishedCited by 23 opinions

From the Kosciusko Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtElliott, J.

The complaint alleges that the appellant is the owner in fee of lands upon which the appellees have wrongfully entered and upon which they are about to construct the abutments of a public bridge. The answer avers that the land upon which appellees entered has been for more than twenty years a public highway of the county; and that for the same length of time a bridge had spanned a stream at the point where they were engaged in constructing the bridge described in the complaint.

The answer is good. A road used as a public highway for *116twenty years vests a right in the public of which the owner…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ross v. ThompsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  2. Webb v. Portland Manuf'g Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Maine · 1838
  3. Doctor v. HartmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  4. Board of Commissioners of Clarke Co. v. State, ex rel. LewisIndiana Supreme Court · 1878
  5. Board of Commissioners v. Logansport & Rock Creek Gravel Road Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1882

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Bishop v. MoormanIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  2. Strong v. MakeeverIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Delphi v. StartzmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  4. City of Fort Wayne v. State Ex Rel. HoaglandIndiana Court of Appeals · 1976
  5. Discher v. KlappIndiana Court of Appeals · 1954

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API