Legal Opinion

Studt v. SHERMAN HEALTH SYSTEMS

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided December 23, 2008No. 2-07-0945PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice O’Malley

Defendant, Sherman Health Systems (doing business as Sherman Hospital), timely appeals from a jury verdict in favor of plaintiffs, Jane Studt and Michael Studt, on their claims for institutional negligence and vicarious liability for the professional negligence of defendant’s doctors in failing to diagnose Jane’s appendicitis. Defendant’s lone argument on appeal is that the trial court tendered an erroneous jury instruction regarding the applicable standard of care for professional negligence. For the reasons that follow, we affirm the trial court’s decision.

As a threshold issue, plaintiffs…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Advincula v. United Blood ServicesIllinois Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Snelson v. KammIllinois Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Walski v. TiesengaIllinois Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Schultz v. NORTHEAST ILL. REGIONAL COMMUTER RAILROAD CORP.Illinois Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Dillon v. Evanston HospitalIllinois Supreme Court · 2002

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Studt v. Sherman Health SystemsIllinois Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Studt v. Sherman Health SystemsIllinois Supreme Court · 2011
  3. Auten v. FranklinAppellate Court of Illinois · 2010
  4. Auten v. FranklinAppellate Court of Illinois · 2010
  5. Auten v. FranklinAppellate Court of Illinois · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API