Frostman v. Stirrat & Goetz Investment Co.
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Albertson, J., entered May 81, 1911, upon granting a nonsuit, in an action for personal injuries.
1Opinion of the CourtMount, J.
— Action for personal injuries. The trial court dismissed the action upon motion of the defendant at the close of the plaintiff’s evidence. Plaintiff has appealed.
It appears from the evidence, that the defendant company was the owner of a brick building, located on the east side of Third avenue, in the city of Seattle; that, by reason of the widening of this avenue by the city, it became necessary for the defendant to remove a part of the building, which stood on the condemned area. This involved the tearing down of the old wall and the construction of a new wall on the line of the street as…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- City of Anderson v. FlemingIndiana Supreme Court · 1903
- Smith v. Milwaukee Builders' & Traders' ExchangeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1895
- Thompson v. Lowell, Lawrence, & Haverhill Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1898
- Koch v. FoxAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1902
3Cited by3 opinions
- Polston v. S. S. Kresge Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1949
- Amann v. City of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 1932
- Frostman v. Stirrat & Goetz Investment Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1913