Legal Opinion

Frostman v. Stirrat & Goetz Investment Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 12, 1913No. 11285PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Tallman, J., entered October 21, 1913, upon the verdict of a jury rendered in favor of the plaintiff, in an action for personal injuries.

1Opinion of the CourtMorris, J.

This is the second appeal in an action for damages for personal injuries. On the first appeal, the judgment of the lower court, in dismissing the action at the close of plaintiff’s evidence, was reversed, and a new trial ordered. This has been had, and plaintiff having obtained verdict and judgment, defendant now appeals.

The facts will be found stated in the opinion on the first appeal, 65 Wash. 608, 118 Pac. 742. Many of the points now relied upon as error were urged in support of the first judgment, where it was contended that the judgment appealed from was proper because plaintiff was a…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Frostman v. Stirrat & Goetz Investment Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1911

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Freebury v. Chicago, Milwaukee & Puget Sound Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1914

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API