Legal Opinion
China Sugar Refining Co. v. Andersen, Meyer & Co.
New York Supreme Court
Decided April 10, 1956PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMorris Eder, J.
China Sugar Refining Company, Ltd., a Chinese corporation, has sued defendants, American corporations, herein referred to collectively as Amco, to recover deposits of $350,000 made to defendants pursuant to a contract executed in 1945 which provided for postwar delivery of machinery and payment in advance. Amco has moved, prior to answer, for an order requiring plaintiff to bring in Bank of China and Yu Foong Cotton Mill, Chinese corporations, as additional parties, staying the action until complied with and dismissing if after a reasonable time in the event of .noncompliance.
The motion is…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Bank of China v. Wells Fargo Bank & Union Trust Co.District Court, N.D. California · 1952
- Blake v. WeidenNew York Court of Appeals · 1943
- Bergman v. Liverpool & London & Globe InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1945
3Cited by7 opinions
- Sillman v. Twentieth Century-Fox Film Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1957
- Joanne S. v. CareyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- Fuller v. Nassau County Department of Social ServicesNew York Supreme Court · 1974
- Panzica v. Cimino, New York County Courts1959
- Henshel v. HeldAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1961
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.