Legal Opinion

In re the Judicial Settlement of the Final Account of Proceedings of Wigg

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 5, 1937PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Per curiam

In a proceeding in the Surrogate’s Court, Nassau county, the executors petitioned for the judicial settlement of their accounts and for an allowance to their attorneys. The petition and the decree, in so far as they refer to the attorneys’ allowance, purport to be governed by section 231-a of the Surrogate’s Court Act. The decree approved the executors’ accounts and allowed the attorneys $50,000. The appeal is by the three principal legatees, mainly on the grounds that (1) the executors are not entitled to full commissions on the increased value of the estate; (2) the proceeding to fix the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. New York Life Insurance v. H. & J. Guttag Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1934
  2. In re the Estate of HawleyNew York Surrogate's Court · 1927
  3. In re ColsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1933

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of MohrNew York Surrogate's Court · 1938
  2. In re GottliebAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
  3. In re the Accounting of BentleyNew York Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Lewis v. BowersDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1937
  5. In re the Accounting of ArmstrongNew York Surrogate's Court · 1950

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API