Town of Durham v. United States
District Court, D. New Hampshire
1Opinion of the Court
CONNOR, District Judge.
These are actions commenced by the plaintiffs in the Superior Court of Strafford County primarily to enjoin the defendants from acquiring by eminent domain or otherwise certain underground water sources in the Dover-Mad-bury Aquifer, all of which the plaintiffs claim they own. The plaintiff, City of Dover, also seeks, among other things, a five million dollar bond for damages, and an order requiring the defendants to construct a dam on the Bellamy River in lieu of obtaining water in the DoverMadbury Aquifer.
*438The complaints allege that the City of Portsmouth agreed with…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Kohl v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Rank v. (Krug) United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1956
- City of Norton v. LowdenCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1936
- In Re Green River Drainage AreaDistrict Court, D. Utah · 1956
- United States v. Village of Highland FallsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1946
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Seacoast Water Commission v. PortsmouthSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1964