Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Philip Morris Inc.

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided April 23, 2007PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCordy, J.

This case arises out of a settlement agreement between the defendants, a number of tobacco companies, and the Attorneys General of the several States. The so-called “Master Settlement Agreement” (settlement agreement) ended a host of lawsuits in which the States sought massive payments from the companies under a range of liability theories. The damages claimed by the States were based on the expense of providing health care to those suffering from smoking-related ailments. While denying liability, the companies accepted (among other things) a scheme of regular payments to the States and…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Green Tree Financial Corp.-Alabama v. RandolphSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Mastrobuono v. Shearson Lehman Hutton, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995
  4. Merrion v. Jicarilla Apache TribeSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Home Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. City of Los AngelesSupreme Court of the United States · 1908

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. In Re Gulf Exploration, LLCTexas Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Feeney v. Dell Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2009
  3. State v. Philip Morris Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 2007
  4. Warfield v. Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2009
  5. State ex rel. Greitens v. American Tobacco Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 2017

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API