Commonwealth v. Philip Morris Inc.
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtCordy, J.
This case arises out of a settlement agreement between the defendants, a number of tobacco companies, and the Attorneys General of the several States. The so-called “Master Settlement Agreement” (settlement agreement) ended a host of lawsuits in which the States sought massive payments from the companies under a range of liability theories. The damages claimed by the States were based on the expense of providing health care to those suffering from smoking-related ailments. While denying liability, the companies accepted (among other things) a scheme of regular payments to the States and…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Green Tree Financial Corp.-Alabama v. RandolphSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Mastrobuono v. Shearson Lehman Hutton, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Merrion v. Jicarilla Apache TribeSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Home Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. City of Los AngelesSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- In Re Gulf Exploration, LLCTexas Supreme Court · 2009
- Feeney v. Dell Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2009
- State v. Philip Morris Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 2007
- Warfield v. Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2009
- State ex rel. Greitens v. American Tobacco Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 2017
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.