Roulan v. County of Onondaga
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be modified, *904without costs, in accordance with this memorandum and, as so modified, affirmed.
Article 18-B of the County Law requires each county to put in place a plan for making counsel available to indigent persons entitled to the appointment of counsel, principally criminal defendants. County Law § 722 provides several options for counties to fulfill this obligation, including ‘‘furnishing counsel] pursuant to ... a plan of a bar association” (see County Law § 722 [3]). To this end, Onondaga County has contracted…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Society of Plastics Industry, Inc. v. County of SuffolkNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
- Roulan v. County of OnondagaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
3Cited by10 opinions
- Zeigler v. New YorkDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2013
- Matter of Stewart Park & Reserve Coalition, Inc. v. Town of New Windsor Zoning Bd. of AppealsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
- County of Onondaga v. BrunettiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- COUNTY OF ONONDAGA v. BRUNETTI, JOHN J.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- County of Onondaga v. BrunettiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.