Legal Opinion

Fike v. Commonwealth

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 15, 1983No. Appeals, Nos. 227 C.D. 1982 and 228 C.D. 1982PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Doyle,

Before this Court are the consolidated appeals of Faye Jean Fike and Margaret Gentile (Claimants) from decisions and orders of the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review (Board) denying them benefits based on the conclusion that they had engaged in disqualifying “willful misconduct” under Section 402(e) of the Unemployment Compensation Law (Law), Act of December 5, 1936, Second Ex. Sess., P.L. (1937) 2897, as amended, 43 P.S. $802(e).

The Board’s decision to deny Claimants benefits in each instance was predicated on the following findings of fact i1

1. The claimant was…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Frumento v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  2. Holomshek v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  3. Nolan v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  4. Bignell v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  5. Byoung Kwon Chinn v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Pryor v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  2. Kowal v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API