Legal Opinion

Penner v. Denike

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 4, 1939No. Docket No. 52, Calendar No. 40,147PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPotter, J.

October 9, 1935, plaintiff and defendant were copartners in the operation of the DeNike Sanitarium in Detroit. Either on February 15th or March 4, 1936, appellee and one Dr. Piorkowski agreed between themselves to become copartners in the DeNike Sanitarium. Dr. Piorkowski was to pay $2,500 for a one-half interest theréin. This agreement was made upon the expectation and belief upon the part of the appellee that he could acquire the one-half interest in the sanitarium business owned by appellant. On March 6, 1936, Dr. Piorkowski paid to appellee $2,500 for a one-half interest in the business…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Johnson v. IronsideMichigan Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Fannon v. LebeauMichigan Supreme Court · 1927

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Lobato v. PaulinoMichigan Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Moore v. DubardMichigan Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Lenkin v. BeckmanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
  4. Jaffe v. HarrisMichigan Court of Appeals · 1983
  5. Gilroy v. ConwayMichigan Court of Appeals · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API