Legal Opinion

Bell v. Dobyns

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided June 27, 1916No. 6546PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Error from County Court. Garvin County; W. R. Wallace, Judge. Action by T. J. Dobyns and others against J. E. Bell. Judgment for plaintiffs, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

COLLIER, C.

This controversy arises on the claim that one of the defendants in error, Dobyns, had sold and delivered to Bell nine bales of cotton, which were burned, and which were sold and delivered before said cotton was burned. Plaintiff in error on his side pleaded and contended that he had not; purchased the cotton: that it had not been delivered to him; that he had no title to .said cotton at the time of its destruct'on. Hereinafter the parties will be designated as they were in the trial coun. The uncon-tradicted evidence is that Dobyns was engaged in the cotton business; that…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Dows v. National Exchange Bank of MilwaukeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  2. The Bank of Rochester v. . JonesNew York Court of Appeals · 1851
  3. Spence v. Norfolk & Western RailroadSupreme Court of Virginia · 1895
  4. Stollenwerck v. ThacherMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1874
  5. Erwin v. HarrisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1891

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. GraySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API