Legal Opinion

Hornacek v. Zurich Insurance

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 13, 1976Published

1Opinion of the CourtEdward F. McLaughlin, J.

Plaintiff moves for an order pursuant to CPLR 3041 directing defendant to serve a verified bill of particulars as to its affirmative defense, setting forth among other things the names of the witnesses defendant will *65produce relative to the affirmative defense on the trial of this action. Defendant made a cross motion for an order vacating or modifying plaintiff’s demand for a bill of particulars upon the grounds that the information plaintiff seeks is improper and outside the scope of a bill of particulars.

This action was brought by plaintiff to recover for his basic economic loss as defined…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Harmon v. Alfred Peats Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1926
  2. State v. Horsemen's Benevolent & Protective Ass'nAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1970
  3. Elman v. ZiegfeldAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922
  4. Arett Sales Corp. v. Island Garden Center of Queens, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1966
  5. Di Mino v. Old Town Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1956

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API