Legal Opinion

Rothner v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided December 7, 1932No. 15429PublishedCited by 11 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

CHRISTIAN, Judge.

The offense is attempt at arson; the punishment, confinement in the penitentiary for two years.

Appellant -was convicted under the provision of chapter 82, Acts of the Regular Session of the Forty-second Legislature. He contends that the act is unconstitutional; the ground of the attack being that the penalty for attempt to commit arson, as set forth in article 1316, P. C., was changed, notwithstanding such change was not within the scope of the caption of chapter 82. We quote the caption of the Act as follows: “An Act to amend Article 1316, Chapter 1, Title 17, of the Penal…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ex Parte HeartsillCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1931
  2. Ex Parte FaisonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1923
  3. Pozil and Jaffe v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1925

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. White v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1969
  2. Putnam v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1979
  3. Ex Parte MeyerCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1962
  4. Rowland v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1957
  5. Falkner v. Allied Finance Company of Bay CityCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1965

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API