Legal Opinion

Earle v. United States Securities and Exchange Commission

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided May 8, 2026No. Civil Action No. 2019-1419Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA KIMBERLY EARLE, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 19-cv-1419 (CKK/GMH) PAUL S. ATKINS, Chairman, U.S. Securi- ties and Exchange Commission, 1 Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER In this action, Plaintiff Kimberly Earle alleges that her termination by Defendant, the Chair- man of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“Defendant,” the “SEC,” or the “Commission”), constituted retaliation for engaging in protected activity and discrimination based on her gender and religion in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (“Title…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  4. Bourjaily v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. Joan Hangarter v. Provident Life and Accident Insurance Company, and the Paul Revere Life Insurance Company Unumprovident Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API