Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Trenholm v. Yelle

Washington Supreme Court

Decided October 2, 1933No. 24646. Department TwoPublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSteinert, J.

The relator seeks a writ of mandate from this court to compel the state auditor to issue to him a warrant in the sum of one thousand dollars. His claim is rested upon a certain provision of the general appropriation act passed by the legislature of 1933, which, so far as is material here, reads as follows:

“Sec. 2. The following sums, . . . are hereby appropriated out of any of the monies in the several funds in the state treasury hereinafter named •. . .:
“From the Accident Fund.
“For the relief of Samuel Trenholm...$1,000.00

“In full settlement of claim for injuries.” Chap. 190, Laws of 1933,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Wolfe v. ParmenterWashington Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Farquharson v. YearginWashington Supreme Court · 1901
  3. White v. City of North YakimaWashington Supreme Court · 1915
  4. State ex rel. Govan v. ClausenWashington Supreme Court · 1919
  5. State ex rel. Jones v. ClausenWashington Supreme Court · 1914

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Ajax v. GregoryWashington Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Peterson v. HaganWashington Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Moran v. State Ex Rel. DerryberrySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1975
  4. Gange Lumber Co. v. RowleySupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  5. Kansas Building Industry Workers Compensation Fund v. StateSupreme Court of Kansas · 2015

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API