State Ex Rel. Trenholm v. Yelle
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtSteinert, J.
The relator seeks a writ of mandate from this court to compel the state auditor to issue to him a warrant in the sum of one thousand dollars. His claim is rested upon a certain provision of the general appropriation act passed by the legislature of 1933, which, so far as is material here, reads as follows:
“Sec. 2. The following sums, . . . are hereby appropriated out of any of the monies in the several funds in the state treasury hereinafter named •. . .:
“From the Accident Fund.
“For the relief of Samuel Trenholm...$1,000.00
“In full settlement of claim for injuries.” Chap. 190, Laws of 1933,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State ex rel. Wolfe v. ParmenterWashington Supreme Court · 1908
- Farquharson v. YearginWashington Supreme Court · 1901
- White v. City of North YakimaWashington Supreme Court · 1915
- State ex rel. Govan v. ClausenWashington Supreme Court · 1919
- State ex rel. Jones v. ClausenWashington Supreme Court · 1914
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Ajax v. GregoryWashington Supreme Court · 1934
- Peterson v. HaganWashington Supreme Court · 1960
- Moran v. State Ex Rel. DerryberrySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1975
- Gange Lumber Co. v. RowleySupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Kansas Building Industry Workers Compensation Fund v. StateSupreme Court of Kansas · 2015
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.