Legal Opinion

Pittmans v. Marshall

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided February 5, 1892PublishedCited by 9 opinions

In Admiralty. Suit to recover the price of coal furnished the steamship Samuel Marshall.

1Opinion of the Court

Severens, District Judge.

The libel was filed in this case for the purpose of enforcing a lien upon the steamer, the respondent in the case, for coal supplied by Pittmans & Dean for the steamer’s use, in September and on the 1st day of October, 1890. The libelants were coal mer*755chants at Detroit, having a dock by the river, at which vessels navigating the stream and the waters it connects called for fuel supplies as occasion required. Their principal office was not located near the dock, but further up, In a more central part of the business portion of the city. They employed a foreman, who had…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. The LottawannaSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  2. EJ DuPont De Nemours & Co. v. VanceSupreme Court of the United States · 1857
  3. The LuluSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
  4. The Mary AnnSupreme Court of the United States · 1823
  5. The Young MechanicU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Maine · 1855

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Williams v. The SiriusDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1895
  2. Neafie & Levy Ship & Engine Building Co. v. The EllaDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1897
  3. De Lano v. The AlviraDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1894
  4. The Gen. J. A. DumontDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1907
  5. McDowell V. The Lena MowbrayDistrict Court, S.D. Alabama · 1895

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API