United States v. American Oil Company
District Court, D. New Jersey
1Opinion of the Court
WORTENDYKE, District Judge:
Defendants have brought three motions to dismiss the indictment in this case. Motion number 1 was dealt with in this Court’s opinion filed December 30, 1965. 249 F.Supp. 130. This opinion relates to motions number 2 and 3.
AS TO MOTION NUMBER 2
By what they designate as their motion No. 2 addressed to the indictment, defendants urge that count 1 thereof be dismissed “on the ground that it fails to state the essential facts constituting the offense charged therein with the definiteness, certainty and clarity required” by the Fifth and Sixth Amendments to the United…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- United States v. Socony-Vacuum Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Russell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Standard Oil Company of New Jersey, Appts. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- United States v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1956
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- United States v. American Oil CompanyDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1968
- United States v. American Oil Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1969
- United States v. ShafferDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1974
- Ab Iro v. Otex, Inc.District Court, D. South Carolina · 1983
- State v. HalemanuHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1982
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.