Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Halemanu

Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals

Decided August 31, 1982No. 8115Published

1Dissent

DISSENTING OPINION OF

CIRCUIT JUDGE ACOBA

I believe the conviction should be reversed and remanded for a new trial on two grounds and, therefore, I respectfully dissent.

*3101.

The first ground for remand is the trial court’s incorrect instruction on the robbery element of being “armed with a dangerous instrument.” Robbery in the first degree is defined in the Penal Code’s chapter on “Property Offenses.” Under that definition, proof of the “dangerous instrument” element is required:

§ 708-840 Robbery in the first degree. (1) A person commits the offense of robbery in the first degree if, in the course…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. State v. JendruschHawaii Supreme Court · 1977
  2. State v. O'DANIELHawaii Supreme Court · 1980
  3. State v. FelicianoHawaii Supreme Court · 1980
  4. State v. TuuaHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1982
  5. United States v. Regis Gary Tornabene, United States of America v. Jacob Joseph CaplanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1955

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API