State v. Halemanu
Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals
1Dissent
DISSENTING OPINION OF
CIRCUIT JUDGE ACOBA
I believe the conviction should be reversed and remanded for a new trial on two grounds and, therefore, I respectfully dissent.
*3101.
The first ground for remand is the trial court’s incorrect instruction on the robbery element of being “armed with a dangerous instrument.” Robbery in the first degree is defined in the Penal Code’s chapter on “Property Offenses.” Under that definition, proof of the “dangerous instrument” element is required:
§ 708-840 Robbery in the first degree. (1) A person commits the offense of robbery in the first degree if, in the course…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- State v. JendruschHawaii Supreme Court · 1977
- State v. O'DANIELHawaii Supreme Court · 1980
- State v. FelicianoHawaii Supreme Court · 1980
- State v. TuuaHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1982
- United States v. Regis Gary Tornabene, United States of America v. Jacob Joseph CaplanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1955
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.