Legal Opinion
Entenmann's Inc. v. Totowa Borough
New Jersey Tax Court
Decided February 18, 2000PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KUSKIN, J.T.C.
Plaintiff, Entenmann’s Inc., appeals the 1998 and 1999 assessments on property designated as Block 169, Lot 6 on the Tax Map of the Borough of Totowa and commonly known as 930 Riverview Drive. The assessment for each year under appeal was:
Land - • $ 3,539,900
Improvements - $ 7,834,100
Total - $11,374,000.
The Chapter 123 Ratio (N.J.S.A. 54:1-35a and -35b) for Totowa was 98.59% for 1998 and 101.59% for 1999.
The subject property is located in the 1-3 Industrial Zone in which the permitted uses include, but are not limited to, research laboratories, offices and offices accessory to…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- City of New Brunswick v. State of New Jersey Division of Tax AppealsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1963
- Pantasote Co. v. City of PassaicSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1985
- Ford Motor Co. v. Township of EdisonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1992
- Glen Wall Associates v. Township of WallSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1985
- County of Middlesex v. Clearwater Village, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1978
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- County of Monmouth v. HiltonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2000
- General Motors Corp. v. Linden CityNew Jersey Tax Court · 2005
- Entenmann's Inc. v. Totowa BoroughNew Jersey Tax Court · 2001
- Clemente v. Township of South HackensackNew Jersey Tax Court · 2013
- State v. Simon Family Enterprises, L.L.C.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2004
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.