Legal Opinion
Lipkis v. Pikus
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Decided November 28, 1983PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
2Per curiam
Order entered May 9, 1983 affirmed, with $10 costs, for the reasons stated in the opinion of Judge Evens, at the Civil Court.
In addition to the well-reasoned opinion of Judge Evens, we briefly note the following. Chapter 349 of the Laws of 1982, which has particular relevance to this early loft case and which may be lawfully applied to cases where the warrant remains unexecuted (Whitmarsh v Farnell, 298 NY 336), permits residential tenants of “interim multiple dwellings” to remain in possession notwithstanding the fact that such buildings do not have residential…
3Cases cited3 opinions
- Whitmarsh v. FarnellNew York Court of Appeals · 1949
- Lipkis v. PikusAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1979
- Lipkis v. PikusAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
4Cited by6 opinions
- Spring Realty Co. v. New York City Loft BoardNew York Supreme Court · 1985
- City of New York v. CastroNew York Supreme Court · 1989
- Enki Properties, N. V. v. Loft BoardNew York Supreme Court · 1985
- Lenario v. WardNew York Supreme Court · 1985
- Lipkis v. PikusAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.