Legal Opinion

City of New York v. Castro

New York Supreme Court

Decided February 22, 1989PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

William J. Davis, J.

Plaintiff City of New York (the City) moves for an order, pursuant to CPLR 6301 and Administrative Code of the City of New York § 7-707, preliminarily enjoining defendants from *767the use and occupancy of the first-floor rear area of a building located at 702-04 Amsterdam Avenue, New York, New York (the premises), based upon its alleged illegal use by defendants.

On July 28, 1988, plaintiff commenced this action, alleging that for approximately three years the premises have been used and maintained as an unlawful gambling establishment. Plaintiff alleges…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. City of New Orleans v. DukesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Reynolds v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  4. Coates v. City of CincinnatiSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. Phillips v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1931

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. City of New York v. 56-01 Queens Boulevard, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1997
  2. City of New York v. Capri Cinema, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1995
  3. City of New York v. J & J Tummy Yummies Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API