Stump v. Phillians
Ohio Supreme Court
1Per curiam
An operator of a motor vehicle has control over its brake equipment and the maintenance thereof. He has a statutory duty to maintain the brakes in good working order at all times. Ordinary care is not sufficient to constitute compliance. An emergency caused by brake failure cannot serve as a legal excuse for defendant’s failure to comply with the assured-clear-distance-ahead provision of Section 4511.21, Revised Code. Spalding v. Waxler, 2 Ohio St. 2d 1, paragraph six of the syllabus; Bird v. Hart, 2 Ohio St. 2d 9.
Defendant was negligent as a matter of law, and reasonable minds could conclude…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Spalding v. WaxlerOhio Supreme Court · 1965
- Bird v. HartOhio Supreme Court · 1965
3Cited by13 opinions
- Lonzrick v. Republic Steel Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1966
- Oechsle v. HartOhio Supreme Court · 1967
- Cartwright v. Firemen's Ins. Co. of Newark, NJLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1968
- Roman v. Estate of GobboOhio Supreme Court · 2003
- Transportation Corp. v. Lenox Trucking, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1968
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.