Legal Opinion

Stump v. Phillians

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 2, 1965No. 38461PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Per curiam

An operator of a motor vehicle has control over its brake equipment and the maintenance thereof. He has a statutory duty to maintain the brakes in good working order at all times. Ordinary care is not sufficient to constitute compliance. An emergency caused by brake failure cannot serve as a legal excuse for defendant’s failure to comply with the assured-clear-distance-ahead provision of Section 4511.21, Revised Code. Spalding v. Waxler, 2 Ohio St. 2d 1, paragraph six of the syllabus; Bird v. Hart, 2 Ohio St. 2d 9.

Defendant was negligent as a matter of law, and reasonable minds could conclude…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Spalding v. WaxlerOhio Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Bird v. HartOhio Supreme Court · 1965

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Lonzrick v. Republic Steel Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Oechsle v. HartOhio Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Cartwright v. Firemen's Ins. Co. of Newark, NJLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1968
  4. Roman v. Estate of GobboOhio Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Transportation Corp. v. Lenox Trucking, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1968

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API