Legal Opinion

Marine Midland Bank v. Surfbelt, Inc.

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided February 16, 1982No. Misc. 8536, Sur. Civ. A. 79-1808PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

TEITELBAUM, District Judge.

Marine Midland Bank (Bank) recovered a judgment against John H. Miller and others and commenced these execution proceedings. The Bank has garnished Miller’s IRA account at the McKeesport National Bank. Miller claims this account is exempt from execution under 42 Pa.C.S.A. § 8124(b) (l)(viii). The Bank opposes Miller’s claim contending this exemption cannot be asserted in these proceedings and, in the alternative, if the exemption may be claimed, Miller fails to qualify for the exemption.

The Bank first contends this exemption may not be asserted in…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. v. SturmSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
  2. Caddie Homes, Inc. v. FALICSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
  3. Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance v. Central-Penn National BankDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1969

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. B.K. Medical Systems, Inc. Pension Plan v. Roberts (In Re Roberts)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1987
  2. In Re AtallahUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1989
  3. Clark v. WilburDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 1996
  4. Bakaric v. Bakaric, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Mercer County1990
  5. Industrial Valley Bank & Trust Co. v. Rosenfield, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API