Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Boehnlein v. Poland

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 24, 1965No. 38653PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

0 ’Neill, J.

The questions which this court must decide are:

1. Does the relator have a vested right to the amount of *182disability benefits which were originally granted to him by the defendants?

2. If the relator does not have such a vested right, did the defendants abuse their discretionary power to decrease disability benefits (provided for under Section 741.49(C), Revised Code) when they reduced relator’s benefits?

Relator contends that he had a vested right to monthly disability benefits of $196.37 once such benefits were granted by the defendants. Relator relies for his position upon Section…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Industrial Commission v. RoyerOhio Supreme Court · 1930
  2. A. F. Waite Taxi & Livery Co. v. McGrewOhio Court of Appeals · 1922
  3. State ex rel. Waller v. Industrial CommissionOhio Court of Appeals · 1943

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Brunson v. BednerOhio Court of Appeals · 1971
  2. City of Daytona Beach v. CaradonnaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API