State ex rel. Boehnlein v. Poland
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
0 ’Neill, J.
The questions which this court must decide are:
1. Does the relator have a vested right to the amount of *182disability benefits which were originally granted to him by the defendants?
2. If the relator does not have such a vested right, did the defendants abuse their discretionary power to decrease disability benefits (provided for under Section 741.49(C), Revised Code) when they reduced relator’s benefits?
Relator contends that he had a vested right to monthly disability benefits of $196.37 once such benefits were granted by the defendants. Relator relies for his position upon Section…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Industrial Commission v. RoyerOhio Supreme Court · 1930
- A. F. Waite Taxi & Livery Co. v. McGrewOhio Court of Appeals · 1922
- State ex rel. Waller v. Industrial CommissionOhio Court of Appeals · 1943
3Cited by2 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Brunson v. BednerOhio Court of Appeals · 1971
- City of Daytona Beach v. CaradonnaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984