Legal Opinion

Michael Salewski, D.v.m., App. v. Pilchuck Veterinary Hospital, Inc., P.s., Res.

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided August 31, 2015No. 72314-6-IPublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

¶1

Verellen, A.C.J.

The mutual promises of shareholders are adequate consideration for a noncompete agreement among the shareholders, even if the noncompete agreement takes the form of promises in the shareholders’ individual employment agreements. And a liquidated damages clause is enforceable if it reasonably forecasts the unascertainable financial harm that would result from a violation of the noncompete agreement.

f 2 Michael Salewski, DVM, does not establish any error on the face of the arbitrator’s award that relied on the mutual promises of the shareholders of Pilchuck Veterinary Hospital…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Barnett v. HicksWashington Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Labriola v. Pollard Group, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Labriola v. Pollard Group, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Walter Implement, Inc. v. FochtWashington Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Marine Enterprises, Inc. v. Security Pacific Trading Corp.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1988

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Mainline Rock & Ballast, Inc. v. Barnes, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2019
  2. Anstead v. Virginia Mason Medical CenterDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2023
  3. Garrett Ranches, LLC v. Larry Honn Family, LLCCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2016
  4. In Re The Marriage Of: Isabelle Kuhlmeyer, Resp v. Sean Kuhlmeyer, AppCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2020
  5. JTH Tax LLC v. McHughDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2020

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API