Legal Opinion

Neighbors v. Penske Leasing, Inc.

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided March 18, 1999No. 2:97-cv-75449PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DUGGAN, District Judge.

This matter is currently before the Court on defendants DNN Galvanizing Corporation’s and DNN Galvanizing Limited Partnership’s (collectively “defendants”) motion to dismiss and/or partial motion for summary judgment. Defendants contend that this Court is without personal jurisdiction over them, venue is improper in this district, and the Canadian statute of limitations has run on plaintiffs’ cause of action. In addition, defendants seek an order from this Court quashing service of process for an alleged failure to comply with Article 3 of the Hague Convention.…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Milliken v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  5. Shaffer v. HeitnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Evans Geophysical, Inc. v. Ramsey Associated Petroleum, Inc.West Virginia Supreme Court · 2005
  2. CSX Transportation, Inc. v. Union Tank Car Co.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2002
  3. Hi-Tex, Inc. v. TSG, INC.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2000
  4. Gronski v. Nice Systems, IncDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API