CSX Transportation, Inc. v. Union Tank Car Co.
District Court, E.D. Michigan
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT PRO-COR LIMITED’S MOTION TO DISMISS FOR LACK OF PERSONAL JURISDICTION
BORMAN, District Judge.
Before the Court is Defendant Procor Limited’s motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction (Docket Entry # 12). Upon consideration of the motion, the submissions of the parties, and the applicable law, the Court will DENY the motion.
I. BACKGROUND
A. Facts
The facts of this case were fully set forth in this Court’s Order dated October 22, 2001, denying Defendants’ Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on Plaintiffs Claim for Contribution. However, a brief synopsis follows.
This…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Southern MacHine Company, Inc. v. Mohasco Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1968
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Hige v. Turbonetics Holdings, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2009