Legal Opinion
Superior Oil Co. v. City of Port Arthur
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided December 22, 1981No. 8701PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CLAYTON, Justice.
Appellant, Superior Oil Company, filed this suit against the City of Port Arthur, attacking the validity of an annexation ordinance and to enjoin the City from attempting to collect any ad valorem taxes from appellant on its property in question, and in the alternative seeking a declaration that the “discriminatory failure of Defendants to include Plaintiff’s property in an industrial district is an unconstitutional denial of the equal protection of the laws” and that “Plaintiff is entitled to have its property taxed on the same basis as property included in industrial…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Moose Lodge No. 107 v. IrvisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Hunter v. City of PittsburghSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
- Holt Civic Club v. City of TuscaloosaSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Myles Salt Co. v. Board of Comm'rs of Iberia and St. Mary Drainage Dist.Supreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Deane Hill Country Club, Inc. v. City of Knoxville and George F. McCanless Attorney General of TennesseeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1967
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Alexander Oil Company v. City of SeguinTexas Supreme Court · 1992
- The Superior Oil Company v. The City of Port ArthurCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1984
- Larkins v. City of Denison, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1984
- California Portland Cement Co. v. Picture Rocks Fire DistrictCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1984
- Alexander Oil Co. v. City of SeguinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1989
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.