Legal Opinion

Beguhl v. Swan

California Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1870No. 1,761PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Application to the Supreme Court for a writ of mandamus to the County Judge of Solano County, to compel him to try a cause. The other facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtRhodes, C. J.

While the cause of Beguhl v. Eastman was pending in the County Court, the defendant filed an amended answer, by which it was attempted to be shown, that the title and possession of certain real estate was involved in the action, and, thereupon, the cause was transferred to the District Court.The District Court ordered the cause to be re-transferred to the County Court, and the cause having been re-transferred, the County Court, on motion of the defendant, ordered it to be stricken from the calendar. The Court did not dismiss or otherwise dispose of the action, but refused to entertain…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Polhemus v. PrattCalifornia Supreme Court · 1865
  2. Cariaga v. DrydenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1865

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Bayha v. PhilipsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1888
  2. Schintz v. MorrisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1896
  3. State ex rel. Keane v. MurphyNevada Supreme Court · 1885
  4. State ex rel. Colcord v. YoungSupreme Court of Florida · 1893
  5. Floyd v. District Court of the Sixth Judicial DistrictNevada Supreme Court · 1913

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API