Legal Opinion

Leader v. Plante

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided July 3, 1901PublishedCited by 4 opinions

On report. Action on promissory note. The case is stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtFogler, J.

This is an action of assumpsit by the indorsee against the maker of a written instrument, declared upon as a promissory note of the following tenor,- namely:

u|406. - Auburn, Maine, August 30th, 1892.

Within one- year after date I promise to pay to the order of ■Richard F. Leader Four Hundred and six Dollars at with interest. Value received,

Telesphore Plante.

Witness: P. H. Kelleher.

Indorsed: Richard F. Leader.”

The writing was indorsed and delivered by the payee to the plaintiff January 2, 1893.

It is claimed in defense, that the instrument is not a valid negotiable promissory note, for the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Chicago Railway Equipment Co. v. Merchants' BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  2. Dorsey v. WolffIllinois Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Campau v. DeweyMichigan Supreme Court · 1861
  4. Stults v. SilvaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1875
  5. Way v. SmithMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1873

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hahn v. Citizens State BankWyoming Supreme Court · 1918
  2. Hansen v. BacherTexas Commission of Appeals · 1927
  3. Ferri v. SylviaSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1965
  4. Fisher v. O'HanlonNebraska Supreme Court · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API